Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Leichling et al v. Honeywell International, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02589
Plaintiff:
Janet D. Leichling , Dawn M. Rose , Gregory A. Leichling and others
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rose v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00591
Plaintiff:
Edna M. Rose
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02614
Plaintiff:
Noreen M. Rose
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv12536
Plaintiff:
Noreen M. Rose
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrett et al v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 1:2012cv01003
Plaintiff:
Harvey J Barrett , James W Berry, Jr. , Jane E Esslinger and others
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc and Zimmer Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barrett et al v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 3:2011cv00497
Plaintiff:
Harvey J Barrett , James W Berry, Jr , Jane E Esslinger and others
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc and Zimmer Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KRUPA et al v. ROSE et al
as 3:2011cv06491
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KRUPA and AMY KRUPA
Defendant:
COLIN M. ROSE and JOHN DOES (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose v. United States of America et al
as 9:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
Sandra M. Rose
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
ROSE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52597
Plaintiff:
WILLIE M. ROSE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ROSE v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72438
Plaintiff:
WILLIE M. ROSE
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
