Cases 11 - 20 of 22
MAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61993
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MAY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv52125
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MAY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv24019
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MAY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv90979
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LOGAN MICHAEL MAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALTON v MAY
as 4:2019cv00094
Plaintiff:
William R Walton
Defendant:
Michael May, MORAN INDUSTRIES INC and MLM ENTERPRISES GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
May et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02224
Plaintiff:
Michael May and Fely May
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mays v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, Ltd
as 1:2017cv21886
Plaintiff:
Michael Mays
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
MAY v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv03205
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MAY
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
May et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv06439
Plaintiff:
Sherry May and Michael May
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
May et al v. Wilcox et al
as 2:2012cv00436
Plaintiff:
Edward Michael May , Ora L. May , P. D. and others
Defendant:
James Michael Wilcox and James D. Wilcox, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
