Cases 21 - 30 of 83
SULLIVAN v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
as 2:2018cv00706
Plaintiff:
SUSAN M. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Piltz v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 1:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
James H. Piltz
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Muhammad v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 2:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Muhammad
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Prochnow v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 3:2016cv02701
Plaintiff:
Leon W. Prochnow
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
In Re: Paulsboro Derailment Ce, et al
as 16-3263
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RONALD J. MORRIS and KRISTEN PICKEL
Defendant - Appellant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO and CSX TRANSPORTATION INC
In re: Paulsboro Derailment
as 16-3172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD J. MORRIS and KRISTEN PICKEL, (husband & wife)
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO and CSX TRANSPORTATION INC
Gross v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (TV3)
as 3:2016cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Gross
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
In re: Paulsboro Derailment Ca
as 16-1654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EVERINGHAM
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY GODISH, PATRICK GORMAN, VINCENT JACKSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO and CSX TRANSPORTATION INC
In re: Paulsboro Derailment Ca
as 16-1656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLO JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO, CSX TRANSPORTATION INC and CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP
In re: Paulsboro Derailment Ca
as 16-1655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN RAGONE
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JACOB SMITH, WILLIAM H. TAPPIN, JR., THOMAS B. ATKINSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO, CSX TRANSPORTATION INC and CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
