Cases 31 - 40 of 329
Holiday et al v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 2:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
Holiday, TJ 1, Sara Robeson and others
Defendant:
Atlantic Richfield Company, BP West Coast Products LLC, Hammond Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Charles Gerrets, et al v. Farrell Lines, Inc., et al
as 16-4269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES N. GERRETS, CORNELIUS BAKKER, WILLIAM G. PALMER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FARRELL LINES, INC., AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INC., AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN LINES, INC. and others
Gest v. CBS Corporation
as 1:2016cv00431
Defendant:
CBS Corporation , Chevron USA Inc, Lyondell Chemical Company and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Gest
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Joseph W. Houpt et al v. AK Steel Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv03619
Defendant:
AK Steel Corporation, American Oil Company, Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Movant:
Crown Central LLC
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Houpt and Kathryn Houpt
Earl Adams, Jr., et al v. Chevron USA, Incorporated, et al
as 15-31091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EARL A. ADAMS, JR., ALFRED ALEXANDER, JENELL ANTOINE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH F. GREFER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON, BISHOPSGATE INSURANCE LIMITED and others
Orange County Water District v. Unocal Corp.
as 15-3934
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Orange County Water District
Defendant / Appellee:
Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc., NKA TMR Company, Equilon Enterprises LLC, Shell Oil Company, DBA Shell Oil Products US and others
Defendant:
Unocal Corporation, ConocoPhillips Company, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., DBA Chevron Products Campany, DBA Chevron Chemical Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and Tesoro Petroleum Corporation.
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. AMERADA HESS CORP., et al
as 3:2015cv06468
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND and others
Defendant:
AMERADA HESS CORP., LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, COASTAL EAGLE POINT OIL COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant:
GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC., LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, H.P. DELTA, INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC., AMERADA HESS CORP., GETTY PROPERTIES CORP. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
GETTY PROPERTIES CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant:
H.P. DELTA, INC. , ROBERT MELECCI , DHANDI TRANSPORT, INC. and others
Counter_claimant:
H.P. DELTA, INC., DHANDI TRANSPORT, INC. and EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION
Counter_defendant:
GETTY PROPERTIES CORP., GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC. and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trammell et al v. American Cyanamid Co et al
as 2:2014cv01423
Plaintiff:
Dijonae Trammell , Ty'jai Trammell and Jaquan Trammell
Defendant:
American Cyanamid Co , E I du Pont de Nemours and Company , NL Industries Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCKENNA et al v. 20TH CENTURY GLOVE CORPORATION OF TEXAS et al
as 2:2014cv06064
Plaintiff:
JAMES P. MCKENNA and LORRAINE MCKENNA
Defendant:
20TH CENTURY GLOVE CORPORATION OF TEXAS , ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF , AMTICO and others
Movant:
EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION
Cross_claimant:
SUN COMPANY, INC. , LAMONS GASKETS , BEASER EAST and others
Cross_defendant:
SUN COMPANY, INC. , 20TH CENTURY GLOVE CORPORATION OF TEXAS , ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 14-3224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of New York, New York City Water Board and New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp., Atlantic Richfield Company, BP America, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation and Mobile Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
