Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Alessi et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11757
Plaintiff:
Cathleen Breen, James Monarch, Richard Mascia and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
De Bree v. Pacific Drilling, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv04711
Plaintiff:
Breen De Bree
Defendant:
Pacific Drilling, Inc., Pacific Drilling Services, Inc., Rex Covens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Breen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01275
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Susan Breen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zelesnik v. Scott et al
as 1:2018cv00584
Defendant:
Jim Cochran, Melani Breen, Cleveland Clinic and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Breen v. 7th Inning Stretch, LP et al
as 1:2018cv01943
Plaintiff:
Jared T. Breen
Defendant:
7th Inning Stretch, LP and Wicomico County, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Breen v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07018
Plaintiff:
Dawn Breen
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer OY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Breen v. Black, et al
as 16-8105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERESIA RENEE BREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMIE BLACK and ALLYSON BLACK
Breen v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11862
Plaintiff:
Joshua Breen
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc. , Abbott Laboratories , AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Breen v. Black et al
as 1:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
Theresia Renee Breen
Defendant:
Jamie Black and Allyson Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Breene v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2015cv03374
Plaintiff:
Michael Francis Breene
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development L.L.C. , Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
