Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Cannon v. Stephens et al
as 2:2013cv02180
Plaintiff:
Cris Allen Cannon
Defendant:
Trevino D Stephens and Havey Mascoll Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aharam v. Krause et al
as 3:2013cv02382
Defendant:
Paul Krause and United Parcel Service
Plaintiff:
Cris Aharam
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Way et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09193
Plaintiff:
Cris Tina Way and Fred Way
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
D'Onofrio et al v. Dillon et al
as 1:2012cv01048
Plaintiff:
Cris A. D'Onofrio and Joanne Kasternakis D'Onofrio
Defendant:
Amy L. Dillon and Robert T. Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZARAGOZA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43242
Plaintiff:
CRIS T. ZARAGOZA, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Dockery v. Horvath et al
as 3:2011cv00408
Plaintiff:
Cris Dockery
Defendant:
Ted Horvath and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Capital Eagle, Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv00339
Plaintiff:
Cris Lynn Mitchell
Defendant:
Capital Eagle, Inc. and Christine Lara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kostelac et al v. Remos Aircraft, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv14062
Plaintiff:
Michael Kostelac and Tracie Kostelac
Defendant:
Remos Aircraft, Inc., Remos Aircraft GmgH and Cris Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Kenneth Brooks v. Vallejo City Unified School Di, et al
as 09-17808
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENNETH BROOKS
Defendant - Appellant:
VALLEJO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, DANIEL GLAZE, RAYMOND VICTOR MOMMSEN and others
Kenneth Brooks v. Vallejo City Unified School Di, et al
as 09-17768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
VALLEJO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, DANIEL GLAZE, RAYMOND VICTOR MOMMSEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
