Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Schutt v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03529
Plaintiff:
Connie Schutt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Canazzi et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
Patricia Canazzi , Julie Adams , Patricia Drummond and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schutte et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01454
Plaintiff:
Francois Schutte and Petro Schutte
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrar et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2015cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tenesha Ferrar , Frances Alt , Heather Amici and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. Schutt
as 6:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Steve Kelly
Defendant:
Jerry Schutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spells Jr. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00129
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, BW/IP International, Trane US, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Spells, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. Schutt
as 6:2015cv00061
Defendant:
Jerry Schutt
Plaintiff:
Steve Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker et al v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joe Donald Tucker and Cora May Tucker
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., All Acquisitions, LLC, Air & Liquid Systems Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REUTTER v. R&W TRUCK SERVICE, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00049
Plaintiff:
DEAN G. REUTTER
Defendant:
R&W TRUCK SERVICE, INC. and JOHN L. SCHUTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schutt et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
as 3:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Schutt and Bonnie J Schutt
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
