Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Graham v. US Xpress, Inc.
as 7:2017cv04353
Defendant:
US Xpress, Inc. and Christopher Reed
Plaintiff:
Devon Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madrid v. Strickland et al
as 1:2017cv00791
Plaintiff:
Jesus Madrid
Defendant:
Latrell Strickland , U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc. and US Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Morris et al
as 5:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Willis Eric Smith
Defendant:
Pauline Morris, US Xpress, Inc. , Mark Coston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DRUNKOVSKIS v. MEAUX et al
as 3:2014cv06112
Plaintiff:
LAIMONIS DRUNKOVSKIS
Defendant:
LEONARD G. MEAUX, U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC. , US XPRESS LEASING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mansion et al v. Mountain Lake Risk Retention Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02223
Plaintiff:
Bernard Mansion and Karla T. Mansion
Defendant:
Mountain Lake Risk Retention Group, Inc. , US Xpress, Inc. , Michael A. Davison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRANSON v. US XPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01390
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BRANSON
Defendant:
US XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC., US XPRESS, INC. and MARTIN WAMBUI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BODIFORD v. US XPRESS INC et al
as 3:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BODIFORD
Defendant:
US XPRESS INC and THOMAS H CROWLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BODIFORD v. CROWLEY et al
as 4:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BODIFORD
Defendant:
THOMAS CROWLEY, US XPRESS INC and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Otter et al v. US Xpress, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00267
Defendant:
US Xpress, Inc. , Jaxson Trucking, Inc. and Robert Keith Evans
Plaintiff:
Candy Otter and Greg Otter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Martin v. Browning et al
as 2:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
Leslie D. Martin
Defendant:
Matthew R. Browning and US Xpress Leasing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
