Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Briggs v. Burger King Corporation
as 3:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Arlenda Briggs
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
INSKO v. BURGER KING CORPORATION
as 1:2012cv00546
Defendant:
BURGER KING CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
FRANK INSKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cronic et al v. Burger King Corporation
as 1:2011cv04108
Plaintiff:
Goldie Faye Cronic and William Ted Cronic
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bartholomew; et al. vs. Burger King Corporation; et al.
as 1:2011cv00613
Plaintiff:
Clark Bartholomew , Tanya Bartholomew and AB
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation, CTI Foods Holding Co., LLC and Does 1-150
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hobbs et al v. Burger King Corporation
as 2:2011cv01469
Plaintiff:
Faith Hobbs and Alexis Hobbs
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Theiss v. Burger King Restaurant, et al
as 5:2011cv00787
Defendant:
Carrols Corporation , Burger King Restaurant and John/Jane Doe Employees 1-10
Plaintiff:
Jean Theiss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edward Bylsma v. Burger King Corporation, et al
as 10-36125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD J BYLSMA
Defendant - Appellee:
BURGER KING CORPORATION, a Florida corporation and KAIZEN RESTAURANTS, INC., an Oregon corporation
Contino v. Burger King Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv05057
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation and Host International, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Ellen Contino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Barnes v. Burger King Corporation et al
as 9:2010cv02070
Plaintiff:
Margie Barnes
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation , William W Cook, Sr and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bylsma v. Burger King Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00403
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation and Kaizen Restaurants, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Bylsma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
