Cases 61 - 70 of 108
Peterson et al v. Applebees Restaurants L L C
as 5:2018cv01215
Defendant:
Cintas Corp #2, Apple Arkansas Inc and Applebees Restaurant L L C
Plaintiff:
Mell Peterson and Clarence Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forte v. Walmart Inc et al
as 1:2018cv00907
Defendant:
G & K Services L L C, Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C, Walmart Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Shelia Forte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QUINONES et al v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
as 2:2018cv11549
Plaintiff:
MARIA QUINONES and DAVID QUINONES
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2, AIRGAS, INC., JOHN DOES I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. Cintas Corporation No. 2
as 3:2018cv00990
Plaintiff:
Robert Young, Jr
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv00177
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Curtis
Defendant:
United States of America and Cintas Corporation No 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Linda Rushton v. US
as 17-2462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA K. RUSHTON and KENNETH RUSHTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION
Curtis v. United States Post Office et al
as 3:2017cv00964
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Curtis
Defendant:
United States Post Office and Cintas Corporate Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Butler v. Cintas Corporation No. 2 et al
as 4:2017cv00933
Plaintiff:
Felecia Butler
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Garrett Damron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHICK v. CINTAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv07441
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCHICK
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION , JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. CINTAS CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv07246
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
