Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Davis v. Cottrell, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Defendant:
Cottrell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
Davis v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 9:2009cv81743
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis and Charles Davis
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pope et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv06167
Plaintiff:
Barbara Pope, Barbara Pope, Barbara Pope and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
DAVIS v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79040
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVIS
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Davis v. General Motors Corporation
as 3:2007cv01983
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis and Charles Davis
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Davis v. Icicle Seafoods Inc et al
as 2:2007cv01565
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Defendant:
Icicle Seafoods Inc and Arctic Star P/B
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
LEVY et al v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
as 2:2007cv69232
Plaintiff:
JO ANN ALGIERS LEVY, JO ANN ALGIERS LEVY, JAMES ALLPHIN and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Davis v. General Motors Corporation
as 2:2007cv00405
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Davis v. MDS Inc et al
as 3:2007cv02053
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Defendant:
MDS Inc, MDS Inc, MDS Nordion and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
