Cases 71 - 80 of 111
Butler v. Cintas Corporation No. 2 et al
as 4:2017cv00933
Plaintiff:
Felecia Butler
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Garrett Damron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHICK v. CINTAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv07441
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCHICK
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION , JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. CINTAS CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv07246
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Frazier v. Total Renal Care, Inc. et al
as 7:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Charles Frazier
Defendant:
Total Renal Care, Inc. and Cintas Corporation No 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chauvin v. Cintas Corporation No. 2 et al
as 3:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Amy Ilena Chauvin
Defendant:
Cintas Corp. No. 81, Cintas Corporation No. 2, Cintas Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lowe v JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 1:2016cv00275
Estate_plaintiff:
Rebecca Lowe
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and Cintas Corporation No 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parks v. Cintas Corporation No. 2 et al
as 6:2015cv06437
Plaintiff:
Deborah R Parks
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Cintas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. Pilot Travel Centers LLC
as 3:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Larry Griffin
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers LLC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Pilot Travel Centers LLC
Thirdparty_defendant:
Cintas Corporate Services Inc and Cintas Corporation #2
Cross_claimant:
Larry Griffin
Cross_defendant:
Cintas Corporate Services Inc and Cintas Corporation #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carroll v. Nickles et al
as 3:2015cv00314
Plaintiff:
Chase Carroll
Defendant:
Bradley Nickles , Cintas Corporation and Cntas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cosby v. Cintas, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Cosby
Defendant:
Cintas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
