Cases 81 - 90 of 168
BAUER et al v. ROACH JR. et al
as 1:2018cv10613
Plaintiff:
MELANIE BAUER , MAUREEN HOMME , MICHELE OGREN and others
Defendant:
DALE ROACH, JR. and EVA ROACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metz v. Francois et al
as 1:2018cv03363
Defendant:
Cowan Equipment Leasing Inc. and Martin Metz
Plaintiff:
Phara Jean Francois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Metz et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00418
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Laci Metz and Stephen Metz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Metz v. AT&T Pontiac Mich., et al
as 2:2018cv11183
Plaintiff:
James D. Metz, Jr.
Defendant:
AT&T Pontiac Mich., The (Black) Wheel John, John Doe and others
METZ v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv05358
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY METZ
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP , ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
METZ v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04260
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
THOMAS G. METZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vega v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01189
Defendant:
Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. and Rebecca Metz
Plaintiff:
Eugenia Vega
Miscellaneou:
Circuit Court for Madison County, TN at Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metz v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00761
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Metz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Metz v. Mallinckrodt LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00968
Plaintiff:
Robert Metz
Defendant:
Mallinckrodt LLC and Cotter Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Metz, Jr. v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation
as 1:2017cv01642
Plaintiff:
Edward Metz, Jr.
Defendant:
Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
