Cases 1 - 8 of 8
GARRAWAY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND A. GARRAWAY and CORDWELL N. BENNETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD, ADMIRAL PAUL F. ZUKUNFT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Manchanda et al v. Lane et al
as 1:2023cv07637
Plaintiff:
Attorney Rahul Dev Manchanda, Rahul Manchanda and Mrs. Sylwia Ewelina Manchanda
Defendant:
AUSA Dana Walsh Kumar, AUST Greg M. Zipes, Judge SEAN H LANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 t Tort Claim
Downey v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv11651
Defendant:
Thomas Armstrong, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, AUSA Andrew E Lelling and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Downey
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
White v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00573
Plaintiff:
Rhonda White
Defendant:
AUSA United States of America, Hospitalist Consultants Group, SC, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Robinet v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00574
Plaintiff:
Linda A Robinet
Defendant:
AUSA United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grillo v. United States of America et al
as 4:2018cv01502
Defendant:
AUSA Jeffrey B Jensen, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States of America, Acting Through the United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Doriana Grillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Van Story et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv01631
Plaintiff:
Ausa E. Van Story and Albert T. Van Story, Jr.
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. AUSA Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01533
Plaintiff:
Conrad D. Armstrong
Defendant:
AUSA Properties, Inc. , Aegon USA Realty Advisors, LLC and Kone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
