Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Martin et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2021cv11011
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Christina F. Martin and David B. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37835
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY B MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Carroll County Sherriff's Office et al
as 1:2019cv03265
Defendant:
Sheriff T. DeWees James, Jane Doe, et al and Carroll County Sherriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Martin, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Lam
as 1:2019cv03264
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Martin, Esq.
Defendant:
Kim Hoa Lam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Danz et al
as 1:2019cv03223
Defendant:
Carroll County Health Services Corporation, David Bland, Erin Danz and others
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Martin, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv00793
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Rodger B Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acevedo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11422
Plaintiff:
Robert Robertson, Catalino Robles, John Harty and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Martin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04298
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Rodger B Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. Western Auto Supply Company
as 2:2018cv08912
Plaintiff:
Wendi Martin Bohanowski, Luke S. Martin, Jr., Stella B. Martin and others
Petitioner:
Faron J Martin
Defendant:
Western Auto Sup Co and Western Auto Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01991
Plaintiff:
Kerry B Martin
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
