Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Emrit v. Universal Music Group, Inc., et al
as 13-1904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee:
ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Emrit v. Universal Music Group, Inc. (UMG) et al
as 1:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Inc. (UMG), Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Levy v. Kiisfm et al
as 2:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Amanda U. Levy
Defendant:
Kiisfm and Clear Channel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cromity v. Meiners et al
as 3:2012cv00202
Plaintiff:
Sam Cromity
Defendant:
Terry Meiners and Clear Channel Communications, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brodzki v. Clear Channel Communications
as 5:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brodzki
Defendant:
Clear Channel Communications
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brodzki v. Clear Channel Communication
as 11-6323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BRODSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS
Brodski v. Clear Channel Communications
as 5:2011cv01395
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brodski
Defendant:
Clear Channel Communications
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARSON et al v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07289
Plaintiff:
TRACEY PARSON and KIDDIE KARE CHILD CARE & EDUCATION CENTER, INC.
Defendant:
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. , CAPSTAR RADIO OPERATING CO. and TARSHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AUGINS v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03313
Plaintiff:
HANA AUGINS
Defendant:
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., RADIO ONE, INC. and ROBERT LITTAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brodzki v. Clear Channel Communications
as 2:2011cv00657
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Brodzki
Defendant:
Clear Channel Communications
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
