Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Thompson v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 0:2020cv00109
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Does 1 through 100 and others
Plaintiff:
Debbie Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02705
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Debbie Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw et al v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01574
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kathy Shaw, Stanley Keim, Hazel Wehrle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv11588
Plaintiff:
Debbie Thompson
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc., Hospira, Inc. and Hospira Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv01406
Plaintiff:
Debbie Thompson
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc. and Cook Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04862
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE THOMPSON
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson et al v. UFP Eastern Division Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01170
Plaintiff:
Charles Thompson and Debbie Thompson
Defendant:
UFP Eastern Division Inc , UFP Mid-Atlantic LLC and Donna Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jane Doe v. South Carolina Department of S
as 08-2161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE, by and through her guardians Gregory and Michelle Johnson, GREGORY JOHNSON, MICHELLE JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, SCDSS, DEBBY THOMPSON, ELIZABETH G. PATTERSON, Director and others
Defendant - None:
KAMERSON SETH COX, TITSA M. FLESCH, HEALTHY MINDS, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
