Cases 1 - 10 of 14
HARRIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv07266
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
DIANE HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv17859
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
DIANE HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 5:2018cv00886
Plaintiff:
Diane Harris
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2017cv04906
Plaintiff:
Randall D Harris and Diane Harris
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2017cv08149
Plaintiff:
Randall D Harris and Diane Harris
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv07709
Plaintiff:
Vicky Diane Harris
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2015cv05958
Plaintiff:
DIANE HARRIS
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Harris et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv12443
Plaintiff:
Diane Harris and James Harris
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. LAFORD et al
as 2:2014cv01304
Plaintiff:
DIANE HARRIS
Defendant:
JEAN C. LAFORD and MARIA LAFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv09397
Plaintiff:
Jeris Diane Harris and Carl M. Harris
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
