Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03096
Plaintiff:
Donald Johnson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09588
Plaintiff:
DONALD JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Combs et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00084
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Barm Combs, Patricia Combs, Allen Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00390
Plaintiff:
Deshunta Miller
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, James M Leblanc, Timothy Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 8:2021cv00490
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
PFC. Donald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Southern Industrial Constructors et al
as 5:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
Donald Johnson
Defendant:
Chad Doe and Southern Industrial Constructors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv96255
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv89528
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75658
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv00932
Plaintiff:
DONALD JOHNSON
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
