Cases 1 - 7 of 7
JOHNSON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2021cv07229
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD JOHNSON
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Almore et al v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC et al
as 2:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
James Allen Almore , Solomon Sylvester Barger , Douglas E. Beasley, Sr. and others
Defendant:
John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC , John M. O'Quinn & Associates, L.L.P. , John M. O'Quinn, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv00929
Plaintiff:
Janice Cook
Defendant:
James Edward Johnson and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv02591
Plaintiff:
Maria Johnson , Susan Plaumann , James Edward Johnson and others
Defendant:
United States of America , Zizette R. Makary, James Pingpank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv84173
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD JOHNSON, JAMES EDWARD JOHNSON, MARGIE N. JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Jackson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00836
Plaintiff:
Sedrick Nell Jackson, III
Defendant:
United States of America and James Edward Johnson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Byerly v. Miller Transporters Inc et al
as 1:2007cv00707
Plaintiff:
Jo Beth Byerly
Defendant:
Miller Transporters Inc and James Edward Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
