Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Sommerville v. Union Carbide Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00878
Plaintiff: Lee Ann Sommerville
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, Bayer CropScience LP, Lyondell Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duering v. Equistar Chemicals, L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv06194
Defendant: Lyondell Chemical Company, Equistar Chemicals, L.P., LyondellBasell Acetyls, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Thomas Duering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Lyondell Chemical Company et al
as 4:2018cv02130
Plaintiff: Jacqlyn Anderson
Defendant: Lyondell Chemical Company , Lyondellbasell Acetyles LLC , NAES Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheri Dahlin v. Lyondell Chemical Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4472
Plaintiff - Appellant: Cheri Dahlin, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Dean Dahlin, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee: Lyondell Chemical Company, Equistar Chemicals, LP and Equistar GP, LLC
Defendant: Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Gest v. CBS Corporation
as 1:2016cv00431
Defendant: CBS Corporation , Chevron USA Inc, Lyondell Chemical Company and others
Plaintiff: Louis Gest
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Cheri Dahlin v. Lyondell Chemical Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3419
Plaintiff - Appellee: Cheri Dahlin, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Dean Dahlin, Deceased
Defendant - Appellant: Lyondell Chemical Company, Equistar Chemicals, LP and Equistar GP, LLC
Defendant: Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Short et al v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00204
Defendant: Amerada Hess Corporation, Chevron Texaco Corporation, Chevron USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Joseph Arsenault, Darren Bashaw, David Bashaw, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Orange County Water District v. Unocal Corp.
as 15-3934
Plaintiff / Appellant: Orange County Water District
Defendant / Appellee: Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc., NKA TMR Company, Equilon Enterprises LLC, Shell Oil Company, DBA Shell Oil Products US and others
Defendant: Unocal Corporation, ConocoPhillips Company, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., DBA Chevron Products Campany, DBA Chevron Chemical Company and others
Amicus Curiae: Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and Tesoro Petroleum Corporation.
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. AMERADA HESS CORP., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv06468
Plaintiff: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND and others
Defendant: AMERADA HESS CORP., LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, COASTAL EAGLE POINT OIL COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant: GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC., LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, H.P. DELTA, INC. and others
Cross_defendant: GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC., AMERADA HESS CORP., GETTY PROPERTIES CORP. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: GETTY PROPERTIES CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant: H.P. DELTA, INC. , ROBERT MELECCI , DHANDI TRANSPORT, INC. and others
Counter_claimant: H.P. DELTA, INC., DHANDI TRANSPORT, INC. and EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION
Counter_defendant: GETTY PROPERTIES CORP., GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC. and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 14-3224
Plaintiff - Appellee: City of New York, New York City Water Board and New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority
Defendant: Amerada Hess Corp., Atlantic Richfield Company, BP America, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant: Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation and Mobile Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?