Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Scott v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01498
Plaintiff:
James Rodney Scott
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30679
Plaintiff:
RODNEY SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09067
Plaintiff:
RODNEY SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15939
Plaintiff:
RODNEY SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv60581
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolfe et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 1:2018cv01155
Plaintiff:
Georgeanna Hammerle, Robin Andrews, Brandon Long and others
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., The 3M Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t - Diversity: Torts
King et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16094
Plaintiff:
Lela Diane King and Rodney Scott King, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
Gene Bottger, Nicholas Cascio, Lakesha Dunn and others
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00607
Plaintiff:
John Rodney Scott
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kelley v. Centro Incorporated
as 3:2011cv00007
Plaintiff:
Rodney Scott Kelley
Defendant:
Centro Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
