Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Harper v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00354
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Susan Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv05859
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
SUSAN HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv03927
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
SUSAN HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv00299
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
SUSAN HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harper v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2017cv16714
Plaintiff:
Susan Harper
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc., Hospira, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv03805
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maritza Ortiz , Carolyn Meadows , Ginger Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00950
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Plaintiff:
Maritza Ortiz , Carolyn Meadows , Ginger Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Harper v. Sam's West Inc.
as 2:2015cv00744
Plaintiff:
Susan Harper
Defendant:
Sam's West Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Harper v. Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order Nobles Mystic Shrine, et al
as 1:2009cv07751
Plaintiff:
Susan Harper
Defendant:
Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order Nobles Mystic Shrine, Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order Nobles Mystic Shrine and Claire Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
