Cases 71 - 80 of 160
Godfrey v. Marsh et al
as 1:2017cv10716
Plaintiff:
Gregory Godfrey
Defendant:
Vicki S Marsh and Richard W Larkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Silva v. Unique Beverage Company, LLC
as 3:2017cv00391
Plaintiff:
Vicky Silva
Defendant:
Unique Beverage Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Anoush Cab, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2017cv10142
Plaintiff:
Anoush Cab, Inc. , Arams, Inc. , Ararrat, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Byrd v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv06786
Plaintiff:
Vickie Dianne Byrd
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Claim's Management Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Jones v. Suburban CJ of AA, LLC
as 5:2016cv13464
Plaintiff:
Vicky Jones
Defendant:
Suburban CJ of AA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Schirmer et al v. Kosydor et al
as 3:2016cv01027
Plaintiff:
Patricia L. Schirmer , Carolyn L. Glazik and Randall E. Smith
Defendant:
Michael Kosydor and Vicki O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOLAN v. SHULMAN, ROGERS, GANDAL, PORDY & ECKER, P.A. et al
as 1:2016cv01792
Plaintiff:
VICKI R. NOLAN
Defendant:
SHULMAN, ROGERS, GANDAL, PORDY & ECKER, P.A., HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION (USA), FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Elliott et al v. National City Mortgage Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04039
Plaintiff:
Vicki Elliott and Donald Elliott
Defendant:
National City Mortgage Inc. and MBank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Okstad et al. v Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. et al.
as 1:2016cv00323
Plaintiff:
Steve Okstad , Michael Anderson , Brooke Balocca and others
Defendant:
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Inc and Reynolds American Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00061
Plaintiff:
Allen, Vicki Pierce, James White and others
Defendant:
Schnuck Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
