Cases 1 - 10 of 67
EAVES v. THE STARS GROUP, US et al
as 3:2024cv08108
Defendant:
FLUTTER ENTERTAINMENT P.L.C., NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF GAMING ENFORCEMENT, MOUNT AIRY #1, LLC doing business as MOUNT AIRY CASINO & RESORT and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRYANT EAVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Miller et al v. FanDuel, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Erica Miller and Kinison Miller
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Akeem Daniels, et al v. Fanduel, Inc., et al
as 17-3051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKEEM DANIELS, CAMERON STINGILY and NICHOLAS STONER
Defendant - Appellee:
FANDUEL, INC. and DRAFTKINGS, INC.
Famiglietti vs. Paysafecard.com et al
as 1:2016cv11784
Plaintiff:
Tracy Smith, Alicia Ferdula, Scott Murphy and others
Defendant:
Paysafecard.com, FANDUEL DEPOSITS, LLC, DraftKings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller et al v. FanDuel, Inc.
as 1:2016cv11729
Plaintiff:
Erica Miller and Kinison Miller
Defendant:
FanDuel Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Miller et al v. FanDuel, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00264
Plaintiff:
Erica Miller and Kinison Miller
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lee Sobel v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10907
Plaintiff:
Lee Sobel
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DANIELS et al v. FANDUEL, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01230
Plaintiff:
AKEEM DANIELS, CAMERON STINGILY and NICHOLAS STONER
Defendant:
DRAFTKINGS, INC. and FANDUEL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lee Sobel v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03106
Defendant:
Does and Fanduel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lee Sobel
Carbone et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10410
Plaintiff:
Carbone, Giancarlo Carbone and Jeremy Huard
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc, FanDuel Inc. and DraftKings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
