Cases 1 - 9 of 9
M3 Cubed US LLC et al v. Seyfarth Shaw LLP
as 1:2023cv00957
Plaintiff:
M3 Cubed US LLC, MIS US LLC, PS US LLC f/k/a Pharmaspectra, LLC and others
Defendant:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 m Diversity: Legal Malpractice
Parrales v. Aditya et al
as 3:2021cv02974
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Parrales
Defendant:
Mahesh Aditya and Santander Consumer USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Arizona Digestive Health Insurance Company LLC et al v. Jawahar et al
as 2:2020cv01046
Defendant:
Siddharth Jawahar, Swiftarc Fund Limited Partnership, Siddarth Jawahar and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson Lim, Hack Jae Kim, Mahesh Mokhashi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramchanndani v. Gahdhi et al
as 6:2018cv01647
Plaintiff:
Mahesh Ramchanndani
Defendant:
Sunil Gahdhi, Chirag Kabrawala and Nikesh Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vigdor et al v. Karam et al
as 4:2018cv04573
Defendant:
Eternal Bliss Limited Partnership, Fassil Befekadu, Anthony Soohoo and Marlee Soohoo Revocable Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Dan Vigdor and Stephen Bradway
Not Classified By Court:
SUPER LUCKY CASINO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Patel v. Patel et al
as 1:2018cv01962
Plaintiff:
Mahesh Patel
Defendant:
Hasmita Patel and Ayesha Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doshi et al v. Cagle Road Land LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00308
Plaintiff:
Paresh Doshi and Jitendra Doshi
Defendant:
Cagle Road Land LLC, Mahendra F Doshi, Mahesh Doshi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lala, et al v. ADT Security Services Inc, et al
as 10-4601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAHESH LALA and SHALINI LALA
Defendant - Appellee:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC and TYCO INC
LALA et al v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02698
Plaintiff:
MAHESH LALA and SHALINI LALA
Defendant:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. , TYCO, INC., JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
