Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Junho Hyon v. Jerry Brown, et al
as 20-16117
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN MARCIN, STEVE SHOWER, SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER AND HAMPTON, LLP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUNHO HYON
SEAWRIGHT v. POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2018cv00460
Plaintiff:
TERENCE T. SEAWRIGHT
Defendant:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
KINKA v. POSTMASTER GENERAL et al
as 2:2016cv05036
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. KINKA
Defendant:
POSTMASTER GENERAL and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
WOLF v. U.S. POSTMASTER et al
as 1:2014cv01605
Defendant:
SCOTT DOE, U.S. POSTMASTER and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
SARAH M. WOLF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
Le May v. United States
as 2:2011cv00831
Defendant:
Craig Colton Postmaster Las Vegas NV and United States
Plaintiff:
George Le May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Cambron v. United State
as 10-2365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDA CAMBRON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
SHELLEE DYKSTRA, Carrier, JAMES F MCINNIS, Postmaster and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Milford, Maine
Ali Sehat v. Frank R Adams
as 2:2010cv04300
Defendant:
Postmaster Frank R Adams
Plaintiff:
Ali Sehat
Cyrus Kim, I v. Federal Way Post Office Postma, et al
as 09-36133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYRUS YOO KIM, I
Defendant:
FEDERAL WAY POST OFFICE POSTMASTER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kim v. Postmaster of Federal Way Post Office
as 2:2009cv01369
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Kim
Defendant:
Postmaster of Federal Way Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Williams v. Postmaster Dinita
as 5:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
Etwilla Williams
Defendant:
Postmaster Dinita
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
