Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Chic Soul, LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Chic Soul, LLC
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Kotsis v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 2:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
John Chris Kotsis
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Stitchy Fish, LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00755
Plaintiff:
Stitchy Fish, LLC
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Schramm v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2021cv10106
Plaintiff:
Dan F. Schramm
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DL Host LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00075
Defendant:
John Does, 1-3, United Parcel Service, Inc. and Doe Corporations 1-3
Plaintiff:
DL Host LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown Family Vision L L C v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 5:2019cv00217
Plaintiff:
Brown Family Vision, LLC and Brown Family Vision L L C
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alex Lock & Key v. The UPS Store, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02685
Plaintiff:
Alex Lock & Key
Defendant:
The UPS Store, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706
Randolph Guthrie, III v. U.S. Government, et al
as 14-14047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDOLPH H. GUTHRIE, III
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, CITY OF NEW YORK, CITY OF MIAMI and others
SIMONI v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv04374
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN SIMONI
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chawla et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2013cv11898
Plaintiff:
Bhuwan Chawla and Aanchal Sharma
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
