Cases 1 - 8 of 8
UMB BANK, N.A. v. KRAFTCPAS PLLC
as 3:2024xc00380
Plaintiff:
UMB BANK, N.A. and UMB Bank NA
Defendant:
KRAFTCPAS PLLC and Kraft CPAs PLLC
Petitioner:
Robert Kevin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
UMB BANK, N.A. v. KRAFTCPAS PLLC
as 1:2024xc00027
Plaintiff:
UMB BANK, N.A. and UMB Bank NA
Defendant:
KRAFTCPAS PLLC and Kraft CPAs PLLC
Petitioner:
Robert Kevin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wheeler et al v. UMB Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Lawyer Wheeler and Ashley Selman Farms Partnership
Defendant:
UMB Bank, N.A. and Horne LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
LAWTON et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2022cv03294
Plaintiff:
LEO W. LAWTON, JR. and KIMBERLY J. LAWTON
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., UMB BANK, MANLEY, DEAS & KOCHALSKI LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Island Farms, LLC et al v. UMB Bank, N.A.
as 3:2021cv00721
Plaintiff:
Island Farms, LLC, Porter Planting Company Partnership and Wyatt Farm Partnership
Defendant:
UMB Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green Hills Development Company, LLC et al v. Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00416
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Stonebridge Holdings III, LLC, Stonebridge Holdings II, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Green Hills Development Company, LLC and Dell Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SUGAR VALLEY CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC v. SAFE HARBOR EQUITY DISTRESSED DEBT FUND 1 LP et al
as 3:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
SUGAR VALLEY CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
Defendant:
UMB BANK NA and SAFE HARBOR EQUITY DISTRESSED DEBT FUND 1 LP
Special Master:
JUDGE JAMES P SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooper v. Paredes et al
as 4:2007cv00310
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hooper
Defendant:
Fred McLauren Dierks and UMB Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
