Cases 91 - 100 of 183
Waas v. City of New Holstein et al
as 1:2014cv01266
Plaintiff:
Donald Alan Waas
Defendant:
City of New Holstein, Francis Schmitz, Gene P Woelfel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Wallis Companies et al
as 4:2014cv01666
Plaintiff:
James Stewart
Defendant:
Wallis Companies, On the Run, Lynn Wallis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennan Dandar, et al v. Church Of Scientology Flag Ser, et al
as 14-13574
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNAN GEORGE DANDAR and DANDAR & DANDAR, P.A.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION, INC., F. WALLACE POPE, JR., Wally, JOHNSON POPE BOKOR RUPPEL & BURNS L.L.P. and others
SICKLE et al v. LEGAL AID OF NORRISTOWN, PA et al
as 2:2014cv03817
Plaintiff:
RON P. SICKLE
Defendant:
LEGAL AID OF NORRISTOWN, PA, ALEXIS SELIGSON, TONY ANTHONY SELIGSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-35448
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03531
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Moody, et al v. Michigan Gaming Control Board, et al
as 14-1511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MOODY, DONALD HARMON, RICK RAY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN GAMING CONTROL BOARD, RICHARD KALM, GARY POST and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Young v. Spokane County et al
as 2:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Michael E Young
Defendant:
Spokane County , Spokane County Sheriff's Department , Wally L Loucks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eimers v. City of Key West et al
as 4:2014cv10028
Plaintiff:
Treavor Eimers
Defendant:
City of Key West , Gabriel Humberto Garrido , Gustavo Adolfo Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
