Cases 101 - 110 of 237
Smith v. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
as 4:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wayne Smith
Defendant:
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Shelley Soniat v. Department of HUD, et al
as 17-40031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELLEY SONIAT
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, DON D. BUSH, RICHARD SCHELL and others
Taylor v. HUD et al
as 1:2017cv00072
Plaintiff:
Margo Taylor
Defendant:
HUD and Progressive Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joseph Guy Vachon v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions Inc et al
as 5:2016cv02419
Defendant:
All Unnamed Unknown Parties Does, Does, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Guy Vachon
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Esposito v. Golden et al
as 2:2016cv08374
Plaintiff:
DARLENE R. ESPOSITO
Defendant:
U.S. HUD and Chasan Leyner & Lamparello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herndon et al v. S.B.H.A. & Staff et al
as 1:2016cv10052
Plaintiff:
Cynthia M. Herndon and Larry Oruta
Defendant:
S.B.H.A. & Staff, J. Watford and HUD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tull v. New York City Housing Authorit
as 16-3609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rosalinda Tull
Defendant - Appellee:
New York City Housing Authority
Defendant:
New York City Housing Authority-Penn-Wortman Houses Management Office, Edith Atkins-John, Manager, Francia Astudillo, Housing Assistant and others
James Muhammad v. North Richmond Senior Housing, et al
as 16-16921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES KARIM MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH RICHMOND SENIOR HOUSING, SHERI GAFFNEY and HUD
Bryant v. Puhl et al
as 1:2016cv03712
Plaintiff:
Hattie Mae Bryant
Defendant:
Todd Puhl, Pamela Monroe, Mark Richts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
