Cases 101 - 110 of 152
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv22987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Sauer et al v. County of El Dorado et al
as 2:2014cv01269
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sauer, Heather Graves, Deborah Tidwell and others
Defendant:
County of El Dorado, Nicole Williams, Alicia Tinsley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Donald Sanchez, et al v. Sergeant Casey Jile
as 14-55515
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONALD SANCHEZ, individually and as sucessor-in-interest, GABRIEL SANCHEZ, individually and as sucessor-in-interest, MALACHI SANCHEZ, individually and as sucessor-in-interest and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CASEY JILES, Sergeant
LEE et al v. PENCE et al
as 1:2014cv00406
Defendant:
BRIAN ABBOTT, CHRIS ATKINS, KEN COCHRAN and others
Plaintiff:
CANDACE BATTEN-LEE, PAMELA LEE, MARTHA LEVERETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tithoff v. Reed et al
as 2:2014cv10489
Plaintiff:
Sande Tithoff
Defendant:
A. E. Reed, J. S. Dame and Owosso, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ratliff v. Shackelford et al
as 2:2013cv32917
Plaintiff:
Sterman Douglas Ratliff
Defendant:
J. S. Shackelford , Kanawha County Sheriff's Department and Kanawha County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R.D.G. et al v. City of Bakersfield et al
as 1:2013cv02057
Plaintiff:
R D G , A C G , F E G and others
Defendant:
City of Bakersfield , Greg Williamson , Sean Woessner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01759
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
