Cases 111 - 120 of 216
Baylor v. O'Hara et al
as 1:2019cv06149
Defendant:
Andrew O'Hara, John/Jane 1-10 Doe and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Tahquan Baylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McBride v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv09923
Defendant:
NYPD Officer John and Jane 1-10 Doe, NYPD Officer Saziye Bilger, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray et al v. Breidigan et al
as 1:2019cv01860
Defendant:
Casey Breidigan, John/Jane Does (1-N) and John/Jane (1-10) Does
Plaintiff:
Cathy Jones and Marie Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
King v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv05250
Plaintiff:
Mr. Shawn King
Defendant:
The City of New York, John 1-10 Doe, Ryan O'cconnor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Angel Jose Velasco v. City of El Monte et al
as 2:2019cv07956
Defendant:
City of El Monte, Does 1 to 100, inclusive, State Of California and others
Plaintiff:
ANGEL JOSE VELASCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bock et al v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2019cv00308
Plaintiff:
Chad Bock and Nathan Bock
Defendant:
Jesse Jones, State of Washington, 1-10 Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborne v. Pickaway County Ohio et al
as 2:2019cv03628
Plaintiff:
Alicia Osborne
Defendant:
Sheriff Robert B. Radcliff, Pickaway County Ohio, PrimaryOne Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Philip Guglielmelli et al v. Does
as 2:2019cv05870
Defendant:
1-10 Does and Does 1 through 10, Jointly and Severally
Plaintiff:
M. H., Nancy Hixson and Philip Guglielmelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv14549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.