Cases 131 - 140 of 1,378
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rivera v. United States; U.S. Government; The United States; U.S. et al
as 1:2023cv01448
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Rivera
Defendant:
United States; U.S. Government; The United States; U.S., U.S. President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., The Biden-Harris Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Ayala v. State of New Mexico, et al
as 23-2013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN AYALA
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arturo Valencia Barrera v. USDHS, et al
as 23-15114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTURO OSIEL VALENCIA BARRERA
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and DOES, DHS Officer #1449; Dhs Officer #985; Tempe DHS Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
