Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Koehler v. Leavitt
as 2:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Alicia Koehler
Defendant:
David O. Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv08202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 1:2020cv01436
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie C Moline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00908
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
NM a minor 7319 2012
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie C Moline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00907
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
KM a minor 1690 2010
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Barton et al
as 1:2020cv00749
Defendant:
Bryce Alan Kerschen, City of Battle Creek Police Department, Jordan Koehler Barrons and others
Plaintiff:
Milo Edwin Nelson, Sr and Milo Nelson, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
