Cases 11 - 20 of 153
Abdul v. Bayview Asset Management, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv07793
Plaintiff:
Samuel Abdul
Defendant:
Bayview Asset Management, LLC, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Community Loan Servicing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 13131 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Reynolds v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Krystal Reynolds
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Richard Gerganous and M. M. Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Reynolds v. City of Raleigh et al
as 4:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Krystal Reynolds
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Richard Gerganous and M. M. Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Goodwine v. Hill et al
as 1:2023cv00057
Defendant:
Jail Officer A. D. F., J. L. L., Victor Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Goodwine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
