Cases 11 - 20 of 136
Abernathy v. Dawson et al
as 1:2023cv02018
Plaintiff:
Dasha Abernathy
Defendant:
Officer Devon Dawson, Officer White, Officer Derrick Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parks v. AIG
as 23-40044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tonya Parks, Bennie Gibson, Francis Gibson and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AIG, an insurance company based in New York, Timothy Henderson, a removed Oklahoma Judge accused of crimes, David Prater, Oklahoma County District Attorney in his individual and official capacity and others
Parks et al v. AIG et al
as 5:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Tonya Parks, Bennie Gibson, Francis Gibson and others
Defendant:
AIG, Timothy Henderson, David Prater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diana Ortega et al v. Mario Abernathy
as 5:2022cv02213
Cross Defendant:
Diana Ortega and Zurone Chen
Cross Claimant:
Mario Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parks et al v. AIG et al
as 4:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Tonya Parks, Bennie Gibson, Francis Gibson and others
Defendant:
AIG, Timothy Henderson, David Prater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16776
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00624
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Pennington v. Tuscaloosa County, Alabama et al
as 7:2022cv01265
Plaintiff:
Garrick Pennington
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County, Alabama and Ron Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
