Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Croston v. Miller
as 4:2016cv00595
Plaintiff:
Earl Croston, Jr
Defendant:
Brian S Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1474
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
ASGOD BARRANTES, BRIAN M. MILLER, EBONY N. WEST and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARA STOHLER, KAY BRANDON, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
League of Women Voters of NC v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
LOUIS M. DUKE, CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Louis Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1469
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS M. DUKE, JOSUE E. BERDUO, NANCY J. LUND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1469
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
ASGOD BARRANTES, CHARLES M. GRAY and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Not Yet Classified:
BECKY HURLEY MOCK, LOUIS M. DUKE, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, OCTAVIA RAINEY, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and others
Smith v. Holmes et al
as 4:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
Wardell Smith
Defendant:
Kristine G Baker, James M Moody, Jr, Jerry W Cavaneau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 2:2015cv01590
Plaintiff:
BRIAN S. MILLER
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY , VINCE ZAPOTOSKY , ANGELA M. ZIMMERLINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
League of Women Voters of NC v. State of North Carolina
as 14-1859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
LOUIS M. DUKE, CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
:
Louis Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 14-1845
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS M. DUKE, CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
