Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Edtl v. Best Buy Stores, Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Ben Edtl
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores, Limited Partnership, Chris Davis, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Harlow et al
as 5:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Keith Jackson
Defendant:
David L. Harlow, Scott Parker, Rob Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Harlow et al
as 5:2018ct03029
Plaintiff:
Keith Jackson
Defendant:
David L. Harlow, Scott Parker, Rob Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruett et al v. Humphreys County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv01186
Plaintiff:
Daryn Pruett and Thomas Phillips
Defendant:
Humphreys County, Tennessee, Chris Davis and Kevin Salewsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creamer v. Kelly, et al
as 14-3252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARJORIE A. CREAMER
Defendant - Appellee:
A.D. KELLY and CHRIS DAVIS
Creamer v. A.D. Kelly, et al.
as 5:2014cv04073
Plaintiff:
Marjorie A. Creamer
Defendant:
A. D. Kelly and Chris Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Creamer v. Rooks County Kansas et al
as 5:2013cv04076
Plaintiff:
Marjorie A. Creamer
Defendant:
Rooks County Kansas, Chris Davis, Dan Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Capps v. Humphreys County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00256
Plaintiff:
Glenn Capps
Defendant:
Humphreys County, Tennessee, Chris Davis, David D. Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seger v. Lancaster, Kentucky et al
as 5:2012cv00384
Plaintiff:
Shaun Seger
Defendant:
City of Lancaster, Kentucky , Brenda Powers , Bret Baierlein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.