Cases 11 - 20 of 578
Clark v. Blueprint Investments, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Blueprint Investments, LLC, Brysod Anderson, Aaron McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Elabanjo v. Griffith et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Samantha Elabanjo
Defendant:
B. W. Griffith and Lawrence Capps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Avila v. ACACIA Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Avila
Defendant:
ACACIA Network, Inc., Trevor Griffiths, Aja Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila v. ACACIA Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Avila
Defendant:
ACACIA Network, Inc., Trevor Griffiths, Aja Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Discrimination Based on Sex or Blindness
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Derek Thomas v. John Bartholomew, IV, et al
as 23-13683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEREK THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BARTHOLOMEW, IV, DANIEL CHARLES DAVIS, HARLAND GRIFFITH and others
WARREN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02047
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, GREG HOLCUMB, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
