Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Abdi v. Clinton et al
as 0:2012cv02048
Plaintiff:
Anwar Mohamed Abdi
Defendant:
Hillary R. Clinton and Timothy Geithner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Perales v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00957
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Vulcan Inc, William Henry Gates, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villareal Canales v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv00013
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Susan Gowlishaw and Hillary R. Clinton
Plaintiff:
Hugo Agapito Villareal Canales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kabbaj et al v. Obama
as 1:2011cv23492
Plaintiff:
Younes Kabbaj and Omar Abdel Rahman
Defendant:
Barak H. Obama, George W. Bush, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Christensen v. Wiseman et al
as 1:2011cv01837
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Christensen
Defendant:
Russell B. Wiseman, Steven Eckstein, Shane M. Leuthold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perales v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv22833
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
United States of America , BP, Amoco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zamarripa v. Clinton et al
as 4:2011cv02343
Plaintiff:
Antonio Francis Zamarripa
Defendant:
Hillary R. Clinton , Susan Gowlishaw and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Perales v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 2:2011cv01621
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
U S Marshals Service, Central Intelligence Agency, Stacia Hylton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WADELTON v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2011cv00049
Plaintiff:
JOAN WADELTON
Defendant:
HILLARY R. CLINTON , PATRICK F. KENNEDY , NANCY POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 4140
Rodriguez v. Clinton et al
as 3:2010cv02374
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez
Defendant:
Hillary R. Clinton and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
