Cases 11 - 20 of 24
PERALES et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv00704
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and DANIEL KEN "DAN&q INOUYE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. PENTAGON, U.S. SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAVERGNE v. BRYSON et al
as 3:2011cv07117
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE
Defendant:
JOHN BRYSON, JOHN GROVER, KAREN L. HAAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Adams v Tyson Foods Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02285
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Tyson Foods Inc, Leland E Tollett, Albert C Zapanta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Janis Cowser v. Barack Obama, et al
as 11-17055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANIS COWSER
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, JOE BIDEN, THOMAS J. VILSACK and others
Cowser v. Obama et al
as 1:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Janis Cowser
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Joe Bider, Thomas J. Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Singh v. Well
as 10-4134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Iqbal Singh and IMS, P.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
Russell G. Wells, James Sherman, John Paris and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tonarelli v. City of Scottsdale et al
as 2:2009cv00953
Plaintiff:
Heather Tonarelli
Defendant:
City of Scottsdale, Alan Rodbell, Chong H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Singh et al v. Wells et al
as 1:2009cv00500
Plaintiff:
Iqbal Singh and IMS, P.C.
Defendant:
Russell G. Wells, James Sherman, John Paris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cone et al v. Josephsohn et al
as 1:2008cv00556
Plaintiff:
James A. Cone, James A. Cone, Chandler Cone and others
Defendant:
Elissa Josephsohn, Debra A. Cone, Kathryn Cone and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
