Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Juan E. Rodriguez v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2019cv03985
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Niall Byrne, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00838
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Estate of Ricardo Dimitri Cendejas, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2018cv09560
Plaintiff:
MARIA TERESA PENALOZA, V. C., RICARDO DIMITRI CENDEJAS and others
Defendant:
Does 2 through 10, in their official capacity as Deputy Sheriffs for the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Juan Rodriguez, Does 2 through 10, individually and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Defendant:
State of Montana, Montana Department of Health and Human Services and John Doe and Jane Doe (DPHHS Employees)
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901
Rodriguez v. Gosselin
as 2:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Rick Gosselin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montel v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2016cv30135
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Montel
Defendant:
City of Springfield, William Catellier, Luke cournoyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cartagena v. Catellier et al
as 3:2016cv30133
Plaintiff:
Erica Danielle Cartagena
Defendant:
William Catellier, Luke Cournoyer and Juan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cartagena v. Catellier et al
as 3:2016cv30134
Plaintiff:
Jesus Cartagena
Defendant:
William Catellier, Luke cournoyer, Juan Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
