Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Erwin v. Trout et al
as 3:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
David Doyle Erwin
Defendant:
Greg Trout, Dan Stidham, Phillip Faulkner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Harrison Tigrett, et al v. Robert Cooper, Jr., et al
as 14-5473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRISON KERR TIGRETT, REGINA SUGARMAN, RUSSELL SUGARMON and others
Plaintiff:
MAXINE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., TRE HARGETT, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF STATE: DIVISION OF ELECTIONS and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
TOWN OF ARLINGTON, CITY OF BARTLETT, TOWN OF COLLIERVILLE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-35168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tigrett et al v. Cooper et al
as 2:2010cv02724
Plaintiff:
Harrison Kerr Tigrett , Regina Sugarmon , Russell Sugarmon and others
Defendant:
Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Tre Hargett, Tennessee Department of State: Division of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00872
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-20617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv02703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.