Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Padilla et al v. Langley et al
as 1:2017cv03028
Plaintiff:
Daniel Padilla, Sean Gunderson, Paul Olsson and others
Defendant:
Joanna Langley, Brian Dawson, Jeff Pharis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Roland Town of et al
as 5:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
Brian James Baker
Defendant:
Roland Town of , Scott Jay, Ron Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
De Luca v. North Carolina State Board of Elections et al
as 5:2016cv00913
Plaintiff:
Francis X De Luca
Defendant:
North Carolina State Board of Elections , Kim Westbrook Strach , A. Grant Whitney and others
Intervenor_defendant:
League of Women Voters of North Carolina , Common Cause North Carolina , North Carolina A. Philip Randolph Institute and others
Amicu:
Daniel Blue, Jr. , Verla Insko , Floyd McKissick, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, et al v. THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al
as 1:2016cv01274
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS , A. GRANT WHITNEY, JR. , RHONDA K. AMOROSO and others
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP , MOORE COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP , JAMES EDWARD ARTHUR, SR. and others
Interested_party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
Louis M. Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 16-2193
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF THE NAACP, ROSANELL EATON, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS M. DUKE, JOSUE E. BERDUO, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of North Carolina, KIM WESTBROOK STRACH, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor/Defendant:
CHRISTINA KELLEY GALLEGOS-MERRILL and JUDICIAL WATCH, INCORPORATED
NC State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
as 16-1468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF THE NAACP, ROSANELL EATON, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1, JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of North Carolina, KIM WESTBROOK STRACH, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
N.C. State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
as 16-1468
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, LINDSEY GRAHAM, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMENTA EATON, BETHEL A. BAPTIST CHURCH, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, PAUL J. FOLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 3, NEW OXLEY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, JOHN DOE 3 and others
David Carter, et al v. Monte Hamaoui, et al
as 16-3107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. CARTER, OUR ALL AMERICAN RECYCLING CO., LTD, dba Red's All American Recycling Co. and ROBERT L. THOMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTE HAMAOUI, CITY OF ROCKY RIVER and OHIO STATE HIGHWAY PATROL TROOPER JAMES BAKER
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Carter, et al. v. Monte Hamaoui, et al.
as 1:2014cv01854
Defendant:
City of Rocky River , Monte Hamaoui , James Baker and others
Plaintiff:
David W Carter , Our All American Recycling Co., Ltd and Robert L Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thymes v. People of the State of California et al
as 5:2014cv02377
Plaintiff:
John A. Thymes
Defendant:
People of the State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
