Cases 11 - 20 of 17,438
Howse v. Trivette et al
as 3:2024cv01125
Defendant:
Jane Doe, J.L. Belton, Glenn Funk and others
Plaintiff:
Rev. Curley Howse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06590
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
JOHNSON v. COLVIN POST OFFICE et al
as 2:2024cv00324
Defendant:
COLVIN POST OFFICE and JANE DOE
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Coker v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00555
Defendant:
Betty Tucker, VitalCore Health Strategies, LLC, John and Jane Does 1-24 and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Gary Coker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. NORDO et al
as 2:2024cv04914
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DETECTIVE TRACY BYARD, DETECTIVE BILLY GOLPHIN and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Richardson v. The City of South Fulton, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv04172
Defendant:
John Doe 4, John Doe 6, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2024cv08554
Defendant:
Cook County, Eng, Cook County Sheriff's Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Draysean Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
GIBBS v. KEARNS et al
as 2:2024cv09192
Defendant:
JOSH HARRIS, DURK BANKS, LATRECIA LITTLES FLOYD and others
Plaintiff:
TYQUAN D. GIBBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holden v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv06495
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O. John/Jane Does #1-10 and Det. Matthew Reich
Plaintiff:
Maurice Holden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
