Cases 11 - 19 of 19
David Willis v. Jasmine Marchant
as 13-7618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JASMINE CHLOE MARCHANT, KEVIN MURPHY, T. J. HAYCOX and others
Miller v. Fieldseth et al
as 0:2013cv02446
Plaintiff:
Stacie Ann Miller
Defendant:
Paul Fieldseth, Jeff Brown, David Kolb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Willis v. Jasmine Marchant
as 13-6383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JASMINE CHLOE MARCHANT, KEVIN MURPHY, T. J. HAYCOX and others
Willis v. Marchant et al
as 3:2012cv00843
Plaintiff:
David Willis
Defendant:
Jasmine Marchant, Kevin Murphy, T. J. Haycox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clifford Lewis, et al v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 11-17301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD M. LEWIS, DONALD D. LEWIS, BOB MALDANADO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, CLARENCE JONES, (now deceased) whose Indian heir, assign, executor, administrator or successor in interest is Lorie Jones, LESTER BURROUGH and others
LEWIS et al v. Salazar et al
as 1:2010at00509
Defendant:
Ken Salazar, FRANKI SANDOVAL, ADRIAN MONTANO and others
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD M. LEWIS, DONALD D. LEWIS, BOB MALDONADO and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Lewis et al v. Salazar et al
as 1:2010cv01281
Defendant:
Ken Salazar, Clarence Jones, Lester Burrough and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford M. Lewis , Donald D. Lewis , Bob Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Freiermuth v Thermopolis WY et al
as 1:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Neva Freiermuth
Defendant:
Thermopolis WY, State of Wyoming, Brad W Basse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
