Cases 11 - 20 of 14,521
Henry v. John Doe 1-3 et al
as 1:2024cv04143
Plaintiff:
Adonis Henry
Defendant:
John Doe 1-3, NYPD Officers 1 & 2 and Family Court Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Janathaen Strum v. Shane Abreo, et al
as 24-11926
Plaintiff:
JANATHAEN STRUM
Defendant:
SHANE ABREO, JEFFREY BRIDGES, COLUMBUS CHIEF OF POLICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SHENK v. GRIFFITHS et al
as 2:2024cv02458
Defendant:
AMY L. GRIFFITHS, AMY L. SHENK, JANE & JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SHENK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley et al v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Jalen Bradley and Ja-Dawn Bradley
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, The City of Columbus Division of Police, Carl Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Payton v. The City of Ridgeland, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Jumanda Payton
Defendant:
The City of Ridgeland, Mississippi, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porter v. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Burdette Porter
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and John Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jones III v. Doe #1 et al
as 2:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Jones III
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodfork v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2024cv01422
Plaintiff:
Mallory Woodfork
Defendant:
Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Clinston Gadea, Ricky Fuentes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
