Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rivera v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
as 1:2019cv10037
Defendant:
City of New York, State of New York, Fire Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rivera v. Palm Beach County
as 9:2019cv81111
Plaintiff:
Jose Rivera
Defendant:
Palm Beach County
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Christopher William Cook
Consolidated Defendant:
Esq. Kim Phan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ann JanetteCortez et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2018cv03248
Plaintiff:
Ann Janette Cortez
Defendant:
Alejandro Pineda, Nestor Escobar, Does 1 through 10, Inclusive and others
Not Yet Classified:
Christopher Barnes and Richard Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. State of Idaho Department of Health and Welfare et al
as 1:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
Ramon Jose Rivera
Defendant:
State of Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and State of Washington Department of Health and Welfare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02362
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Masso v. Town of North Reading et al
as 1:2017cv11392
Plaintiff:
Jose Rivera Masso
Defendant:
Town of North Reading , Thomas Hatch and Angel Miguel Beltre Tejada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv02816
Plaintiff:
JOSE RIVERA
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
