Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00259
Defendant:
McGregor, Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fonseca v. City of Medford et al
as 1:2022cv01416
Plaintiff:
April Fonseca and April Ehrlich
Defendant:
City of Medford, Jackson County, James Barringer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00797
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlock v. Men's Addiction Recovery Campus et al
as 1:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Harrison P. Whitlock
Defendant:
Men's Addiction Recovery Campus and Michael Todd Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowd v. Aronberg et al
as 9:2018cv80054
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Dowd
Defendant:
David Aronberg and Sharon R. Bock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowd v. Palm Beach County Florida Sheriff Department et al
as 9:2017cv81340
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Dowd
Defendant:
Palm Beach County Florida Sheriff Department and WPTV News Channel 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowd v. Florida State Department of Children and Families et al
as 9:2017cv81286
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Dowd
Defendant:
Florida State Department of Children and Families, West Palm Beach Police Department and Courtney Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
